i have a small toy quadcopter. it was not bad, but the original plastic frame had too many unnecessary parts and the flight time was not very interesting.

so i decided to use it as a small hardware experiment.

i removed the original frame and other plastic parts, designed my own frame, and printed it. after putting the electronics, motors, propellers, and the original battery back onto the new frame, the total weight became:

47g

the original toy quadcopter was:

59g

so the custom frame version saved:

59g - 47g = 12g

for such a small drone, 12g is a lot.

after that the next obvious question was: if the drone is now lighter, can i use the saved weight for a bigger battery?

---

original battery

the original battery is marked as:

HPY 752035
3.7V
380mAh
1.41Wh

it is a 1s lipo battery. 3.7v is the nominal voltage, not the full charge voltage.

for a 1s lipo:

nominal voltage: 3.7V
full charge voltage: 4.20V

the test document for this battery lists it as a polymer lithium-ion battery with:

model: HPY 752035
rated capacity: 380mAh
rated energy: 1.406Wh
charge cut-off voltage: 4.2V
standard charging current: 76mA
max charging current: 1900mA
charge cut-off current: 7.6mA
max discharging current: 7600mA
connection: 1S1P

this is useful because it shows that the original battery is not just a random small lithium cell. it is a high-rate lipo made for a drone.

---

charging it from a laboratory power supply

before changing the battery, i wanted to understand how to charge the original one safely.

with a laboratory power supply, the correct mode is cc/cv:

cc = constant current
cv = constant voltage

the settings are:

voltage: 4.20V
current limit: chosen charging current

for a slow and safe charge, the standard current from the test document is:

76mA

but i first used:

200mA

for a 380mah battery this is:

200mA / 380mAh = 0.53C

so 200ma is not extreme. it is more than the standard current, but far below the listed maximum.

then i also thought about 500ma:

500mA / 380mAh = 1.3C

this is still below the documented max charge current, but i would not use it as my default with a lab power supply. the battery may support it, but fast charging is not the same as gentle charging.

my practical charging settings are:

4.20V
200mA current limit
stop when current drops to around 8-10mA

the important part is not to go above 4.20v.

with a lab power supply there is no smart lipo charger logic. it will not really "finish" the charge for me. i need to stop it when the voltage is at 4.20v and the current has fallen close to the cutoff current.

---

why the battery current rating is so high

the max charging current in the document looks very high:

1900mA

for a 380mah battery this is:

1900mA / 380mAh = 5C

and the max discharge current is even higher:

7600mA / 380mAh = 20C

this makes sense for a drone battery.

small quadcopters need short bursts of high current. motors do not behave like a small led or a microcontroller board. when the drone climbs, corrects position, or recovers from movement, the motors can pull several amps.

that is also why replacing the battery with an ordinary li-ion cell is a bad idea.

a normal li-ion cell may have the same voltage and even more capacity, but if it cannot provide enough current, the voltage will sag. the drone may become weak, reset the controller, trigger low battery mode early, or overheat the cell.

so for this experiment i only considered 1s lipo drone batteries.

---

weight after the custom frame

the rebuilt drone weighs:

47g with original battery

the original battery weighs:

9.60g

so the drone without battery is:

47g - 9.60g = 37.4g

this number is the base for all battery calculations.

custom frame without battery: 37.4g

now i can compare battery options.

---

option 1: 1600mah battery

the first tempting option was a much larger battery:

1600mAh
43g

the total weight would become:

37.4g + 43g = 80.4g

so the drone would be:

80.4g total

compared to the original toy quadcopter:

80.4g - 59g = 21.4g heavier

that is about:

21.4g / 59g = 36% heavier than stock

compared to my custom frame with the original battery:

80.4g - 47g = 33.4g heavier

that is about:

33.4g / 47g = 71% heavier

the battery capacity increase looks great:

1600mAh / 380mAh = 4.2x

but this does not mean the drone will fly 4.2 times longer.

the battery also becomes more than half of the whole aircraft weight:

43g / 80.4g = 53%

at this point the drone becomes almost a flying battery with motors attached.

it may still fly, but the motors will need much more throttle just to hover. the drone will probably become less responsive, and the motors may become hot much faster.

i would test this battery only carefully:

1. mount it exactly in the center
2. hover low over something soft
3. fly for 20-30 seconds
4. land and check motor temperature
5. stop if the motors are hot or if hover needs too much throttle

if it hovers at 70-80% throttle, this setup is not good. it means there is not enough thrust reserve.

so the 1600mah battery is interesting, but too extreme for this drone.

---

option 2: 650mah battery

the second option is much more reasonable:

650mAh
18g

the total weight would become:

37.4g + 18g = 55.4g

this is a very different result.

compared to the original toy quadcopter:

59g - 55.4g = 3.6g lighter

so even with a bigger battery, the drone is still lighter than it was originally.

compared to my custom frame with the original battery:

55.4g - 47g = 8.4g heavier

this is a much smaller penalty.

the capacity increase is:

650mAh / 380mAh = 1.7x

this is not as impressive on paper as 1600mah, but it is much more balanced. the drone should still have a normal thrust-to-weight ratio, and the motors should not suffer as much.

this is exactly the kind of tradeoff that makes sense after rebuilding the frame: use the saved weight for a battery that is larger, but not absurdly larger.

---

expected flight time

the original battery has:

380mAh

the better replacement candidate has:

650mAh

that is:

1.7x more capacity

because the total drone weight with the 650mah battery is still lower than the original stock weight, the flight time increase may be close to the capacity increase.

if the original flight time was around 5 minutes, i would expect something like:

7-8 minutes

maybe a little more, depending on the motors, propellers, battery quality, and flight style.

with the 1600mah battery the stored energy is much higher, but the extra weight may destroy much of the benefit. the flight time may increase, but the drone will probably become heavy and inefficient.

---

final comparison

the numbers are:

original toy quadcopter:
59g total

custom printed frame with original battery:
47g total

custom frame without battery:
37.4g

original battery:
380mAh
9.60g

big battery option:
1600mAh
43g
80.4g total

balanced battery option:
650mAh
18g
55.4g total

the 1600mah option gives:

4.2x capacity
but 80.4g total weight

the 650mah option gives:

1.7x capacity
and 55.4g total weight

for this drone, the 650mah battery is the better engineering choice.

---

conclusion

after rebuilding the quadcopter with my own 3d-printed frame, i saved enough weight to use a better battery.

but the best battery is not the biggest one.

the 1600mah pack is too heavy for this size of drone. it may fly, but it will likely make the quadcopter slow, inefficient, and hard on the motors.

the 650mah pack looks like the sweet spot. it gives noticeably more energy while keeping the total weight below the original stock weight.

so the plan is:

use a 1s 3.7v lipo
keep full charge voltage at 4.20v
check connector polarity
avoid random low-current li-ion cells
use a drone/high-rate lipo
test motor temperature after short flights
choose 650mah instead of 1600mah

this is the nice part of small hardware projects. the final answer is not hidden in a datasheet only. it appears when the numbers, the weight scale, and the real object on the table all agree with each other.

i used to connect my vinyl record player to a speaker manually when i want to listen records.
it was annoying and not practical to touch wires every time, so i decided to use my headless linux server that surprisignly stay nearby as a network audio bridge and listen records through my studio PC.

this article describes how i built an automated analog-to-network pipeline using pipewire, vban, and wireplumber.

---

hardware setup

the physical setup was straightforward. i connected the audio output of the record player to the line-in jack on the server’s motherboard.

on the linux side i added my user to the audio group to allow access to the sound device and used alsamixer to unmute the capture channel and enable the line-in input.

at this point the server could capture audio from the record player.

---

phase 1: proof of concept

before automating the entire pipeline, i first confirmed that audio could be transmitted over the network with low latency.

for this experiment i used pipewire together with the vban network protocol.

i created the following configuration file:

~/.config/pipewire/pipewire.conf.d/vban-send.conf

this file loads the libpipewire-module-vban-send module and configures it to send audio packets to my windows pc on port 6980.

a minimal configuration looks like this:

context.modules = [
  { name = libpipewire-module-vban-send
    args = {
      destination.ip = "192.168.1.50"
      destination.port = 6980

      sess.name = "LineInStream"
      sess.media = "audio"

      audio.rate = 48000
      audio.channels = 2
      audio.format = "S16LE"
      audio.position = [ FL FR ]

      stream.props = {
        node.name = "vban-linein-send"
        node.description = "VBAN Line-In Sender"
        media.class = "Audio/Sink"
      }
    }
  }
]

this configuration creates a pipewire sink named vban-linein-send. any audio routed into this sink is transmitted as a vban stream.

to test the connection i played an audio file directly into the new sink:

pw-play --target=vban-linein-send test.wav

on my windows pc i opened voicemeeter banana, enabled the vban receiver, and configured it to listen for the stream named LineInStream.

the test audio file played through the speakers immediately, confirming that the network connection worked. voicemeeter project is awesome, support them.

---

understanding the audio graph

pipewire represents audio routing as a graph of connected nodes. once the capture device and the vban sender are active, the signal path looks like this:

vinyl player
     │
     ▼
motherboard line-in
(alsa capture node)
     │
     ▼
pipewire audio graph
     │
     ▼
vban send node
(libpipewire-module-vban-send)
     │
     ▼
udp network stream (through a home network)
     │
     ▼
windows pc (voicemeeter vban receiver)
     │
     ▼
hi-fi speakers

the remaining task was to connect the capture node to the vban node automatically during startup.

---

phase 2: creating a persistent setup

the goal was to make the system operate automatically. if server reboots, it should capture audio from the line-in port and stream it to the windows machine without manual intervention.

first, i enabled systemd lingering so that pipewire and wireplumber could run without an active login session:

loginctl enable-linger your-username

next, i wrote a wireplumber lua script using objectmanager. the script detects the alsa capture ports and links them to the vban sender ports whenever both are present in the pipewire graph.

while implementing this persistent configuration i encountered two issues.

---

hurdle 1: line-in gain reset

during the first full test the audio sounded distorted.

the cause was the default line-in gain configured by the motherboard codec. the capture boost was too high for the signal coming from the record player.

lowering the gain in alsamixer removed the distortion. however, after each reboot the gain returned to its original value.

this happens because modern pipewire systems are managed by wireplumber, which applies its own mixer state during startup and overrides alsa settings.

the correct approach was to configure the volume through wireplumber.

first i located the capture device:

wpctl status

then i set the capture level:

wpctl set-volume 48 0.10

wireplumber stores this setting in its state database and reapplies it automatically after each restart.

---

hurdle 2: the script was not loaded

after solving the volume issue, i placed my lua script in:

~/.local/share/wireplumber/scripts/vban-autolink.lua

and created a configuration fragment:

~/.config/wireplumber/wireplumber.conf.d/99-vban-autolink.conf

this fragment instructs wireplumber to load the script during startup.

after rebooting the server the audio was still silent. investigation showed that the script was not being loaded.

the reason is related to wireplumber’s configuration hierarchy. if the file wireplumber.conf does not exist in the user configuration directory, wireplumber uses the system configuration in /usr/share/wireplumber and ignores user configuration fragments.

the solution was to copy the base configuration file:

cp /usr/share/wireplumber/wireplumber.conf ~/.config/wireplumber/wireplumber.conf

once this file existed in the user configuration directory, wireplumber detected the custom fragment and loaded the lua script correctly.

---

final result

after resolving these issues the system operates automatically.

when the server starts:

1. pipewire launches in the background
2. wireplumber restores the capture volume
3. the vban module initializes
4. the lua script links the line-in capture ports to the vban sender

from that moment the server continuously transmits the audio signal from the record player to the windows pc in my studio. in voicemeeter i can then route the incoming vinyl stream to any output device, such as the sound bar, the studio hi-fi speakers, or headphones.

i bought a netac portable ssd (1tb) to use for backups. i use this drive with my linux computer and my samsung android phone, so i formatted it as exfat using the phone.

at first, the drive was very fast. i could copy large files quickly on both devices.

but recently, the speed on linux became very slow. a 300gb backup file that i created months ago now took 3 days to read. the speed was not just slow; it was unstable. the read speed would start normally, then drop to 0 mb/s for several seconds, then start again, and then stop again. it kept freezing and restarting.

i thought the drive was broken, but the problem was actually how the software handles "garbage collection" on the drive. here is how i found the problem and fixed it.

the symptoms

the drive (vendor id 0dd8, product id 2320) connected correctly, but reading files was very difficult.

• before: fast reads and writes.
• now: reading data (especially small blocks) was very slow.
• the main problem: the speed would stop completely (0 mb/s) many times. the drive remained connected, but it paused working.
• context: i used the drive with my android phone for months. android writes files correctly, but it does not clean up deleted files on external usb drives.

finding the problem

1. testing the drive

i used a tool called f3probe to test the drive. this tool usually checks for fake drives, but it also measures speed. the results showed the problem:

average write time: 201µs (normal is ~1-10µs)
probe time: 14 minutes (should be less than 10 seconds)

the write time was 200 times slower than normal.

here is why: the ssd was full of "garbage" data. because i used it with my phone for months, i wrote and deleted many files. but android does not send a command called trim to external drives. trim tells the drive which data is deleted and can be erased. without trim, the drive thinks it is 100% full of valid data.

when i tried to read files on linux, the drive's internal controller had to search through all this old data. it became overloaded, paused all work to organize its memory (causing the drop to 0 mb/s), and then started again.

2. the solution: trim

to fix this, the computer must send the trim (or scsi unmap) command. this command cleans the drive.

i tried to run the trim command on linux:

sudo fstrim -v /mnt/usb
# fstrim: the discard operation is not supported

the error message said "not supported." the usb chip inside the netac enclosure was reporting incorrect information to linux. it said it could not do trim, even though the ssd inside could.

the fix: force the unmap command

i had to force linux to ignore the usb chip's report and send the trim command anyway.

step 1: force the setting

i found the device setting in the system files and changed it to unmap.

(note: replace /dev/sda with your correct device name)

# find the specific id for the disk
ls /sys/block/sda/device/scsi_disk/
# output example: 6:0:0:0

# force 'unmap' mode
echo "unmap" | sudo tee /sys/class/scsi_disk/6:0:0:0/provisioning_mode

then i ran the trim command again:

sudo fstrim -v /mnt/usb
# output: /mnt/usb: 931.4 gib trimmed

it worked! the drive accepted the command and instantly cleaned nearly 1tb of old data from my months of android usage.

step 2: make the fix permanent

the command above stops working when you restart the computer. to make it permanent, i added a rule file.

i created a file named /etc/udev/rules.d/50-netac-trim.rules with this content:

action=="add|change", attrs{idvendor}=="0dd8", attrs{idproduct}=="2320", subsystem=="scsi_disk", attr{provisioning_mode}="unmap"

finally, i reloaded the rules:

sudo udevadm control --reload-rules

the results

after cleaning the drive, i tested the speed again.

measurement	before fix (slow)	after fix (fast)	improvement
write latency	201 µs	1 µs	200x faster
test time	14m 03s	6.77s	125x faster

the "drop to zero" pauses stopped immediately. the drive reads data smoothly again.

conclusion

be careful about not trimming your ssd.
and for devices with custom provisioning_mode, note to:

1. connect the drive to a linux pc occasionally.
2. force the provisioning_mode to unmap if necessary.
3. run sudo fstrim -v /mountpoint to refresh the drive.

other

while looking onto an ssd board i have found these pins, idk how can I use it but might be something useful for later

---

hardware: netac portable ssd 1tb (usb id 0dd8:2320)
os: linux (kernel 6.x) & android (samsung)